Promethean Homes
  • Home
  • Design
    • Design/Build Method
    • Services
    • Green Homes
    • Certification Programs
    • Details
  • Zero Net Energy Homes
  • Links
  • FAQs
  • Contact
    • About
  • Portfolio
  • Blog

Passive House, iPhones, and Ebenezer Scrooge

12/12/2012

0 Comments

 
The pace of change in electronic devices is astounding.

As an example, in a little over a hundred years, we went from the telegraph---the standard method for long distance communication---to the cellular phone.

And that pace of change is only accelerating.

In 1992, Motorola came out with the Bag Phone, a premier product that gave users nearly three hours of talk time. It weighed ten pounds and served a single purpose. Fast forward to 2012. Today we have the iPhone 5. It weights a mere 3.95 ounces and can perform a dizzying array of functions for up to eight hours.

If only we could upgrade our houses like we upgrade our cell phones . . .

Most people have the financial ability to upgrade their phone every year or two, and in some cases they have to upgrade (planned obsolescence). But houses? Not so much. Who can afford a $100,000 gut rehab? It costs too much and takes too long. It just doesn't happen very often.

If you look at housing over the last century, there has been a sea change in technology there too. Yet, in many ways, we're still building houses the same way we did in 1912. We've moved from coal furnaces in the basement to high efficiency natural gas models . . . but chances are the furnace is still sitting in the basement of your new house.

Albert, Righter, & Tittmann Architects designed a passive house project for the Charlotte, VT Habitat for Humanity. They also produced a great graphic that shows the evolution of housing. It clearly illustrates what was, what is, and what could be . . .

Forgive me, but that almost sounds like Dicken's warning to Ebenezer Scrooge, in A Christmas Carol. I think that incessant holiday music is takiing effect!

Picture
These days, you won't find anybody carrying around a Motorola Bag Phone, but most people are still living in 19th and 20th century houses---and in many cases, we're still building them as if nothing has changed.

If you study the drawing of the 21st century house, you will see that it is the energy efficient house. The technologically advanced house. Yet in many ways, it is the simple house.

It's airtight and ventilated with heat recovery. It has more insulation, fewer bells and whistles. It accepts the sun in the winter and rejects it in the summer. It uses small devices for heating and cooling, devices that cost little to purchase and even less to operate.

Upgrading a house to meet today's energy efficiency standards is costly and difficult. For most, it only makes sense when the structure is sound, but all of the exterior finishes are failing.

But if you are building a new house, why go back to the 20th century?
__________________

Happy Holidays to you and yours!
0 Comments

Utility Bills

12/5/2012

1 Comment

 
In the last post, I talked about cost parity and Passive House.

In this post, I'll take it out of the theoretical world, provide a clear example.

We moved into our Passive Bauernhaus in June 2012, but didn't get our first full month electric bill until July. Since then, the electric bill for our Passive Bauernhaus has averaged 663 kWh/month or $81.04/month. This total includes the typical $25 - $30 service charge.

Since it is an all-electric house, we only pay one bill. There's no propane, natural gas, or firewood. Electricity covers all of our loads:

    Well water (pumping)
    Domestic Hot Water
    Heating / Cooling
    Ventilation
    Lighting
    Appliance Loads
    Plug Loads (computers, TV, alarm clock, coffee maker, etc.)
Picture
In the previous year, we lived in a Fishersville area townhouse. The townhouse was built to existing codes, circa 2006. In terms of usable space, it was very similiar to the Passive Bauernhaus---4 bedrooms and 3 1/2 baths. It was a multi-family development, so we were sandwiched between two other units of the same size. It used propane for heating, domestic hot water, and the clothes dryer. And, electricity, of course.

I recently dug into our townhouse financial records to look at our utility bill history. After tallying the numbers, our average monthly townhouse bill came to $243.83 (for a full calendar year). The lowest month came to $122.91; the highest jumped to $429.87.

We haven't lived through a full calendar year in the Passive Bauernhaus, so it may be a little premature to call this one . . . but I can't resist. I say that because we're tracking right in-line with the PHPP energy modeling software.

Here's the bottom line: we're saving > $150 / month.

It's not earth shaking, but it's not too shabby either. It becomes significant when you project this over a typical 30 year mortgage.

And . . . it provides the margin that allows a Passive House to reach cost parity.
1 Comment

Cost Parity and Passive House

11/28/2012

0 Comments

 
Adam Cohen is an architect, Certified Passive House Consultant, and a principal at Structures Design/Build in Roanoke, VA. He has been quite successful at promoting the Passive House standard in both commercial and residential projects. Part of this success is likely a result of Adam's energetic personality, but I'm quite sure it also has to do with hard numbers---and economic sanity. Here are a couple of Adam's mantras:

"Do you want to pay for equity or electrons?"

"We can achieve cost parity in residential projects, and for commercial projects,
Passive House offers a really great return on investment."

Structures Design/Build has the numbers to back up these claims. Some of their Passive House projects include:

Franklin County Public School - Center for Energy Efficient Design (CEED)
Emory and Henry College - Hickory Hall Dormitory
Specht Passive House - Custom Home

If you talk to Adam, you will find he is passionate about the financial viability of Passive House. So what is cost parity? And how is energy efficient construction cost effective? Below I'll provide an example:

-------

Building A is a 2,000 sq. ft. custom home, built to code. Total cost to build is $250,000. And the monthly utility bills for this house average $225.

Building B is identical, but built to the Passive House standard. Total cost to build is $275,000 (10% or $25,000 in additional capital and labor). The monthly utility bills for this Passive House average $75.

Let's assume that both houses have a conventional 30 year loan. In both examples, the owner provides $50,000 for a downpayment, and the bank charges 4.5% interest.

Building A -  Mortgage Payment - $1,013.37
                    Average Monthly Utility Bill - $225
                    Total Monthly Cost - $1,238.37

Building B - Mortgage Payment - $1,140.04
                    Average Monthly Utility Bill - $75
                    Total Monthly Cost - $1,215.04

So, the Passive House has a higher initial cost, but the total monthly bills are equal to a code built house (actually a little lower). This is cost parity.

 And . . . can you guess which house will be more comfortable?

0 Comments

    Author

    Daniel Ernst

    Archives

    April 2015
    February 2015
    September 2014
    May 2014
    December 2013
    July 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012

    Categories

    All
    Brick Flashing
    Brick Veneer
    Cost Parity
    Earthcraft
    Electric Bills
    Energy Efficient Construction
    Energy Star
    Fire Safety
    Green Building Standards
    Gut Rehab
    Innovation Award
    Iphone
    Islandable PV Array
    Leed
    Living Building Challenge
    Mineral Wool
    Negawatt
    Outdoor Wood Boiler
    Passive House
    Phius
    Prometheus
    Renewable Energy
    Reservoir Cladding
    Savings
    Scrooge
    Structures Design/Build
    Svec
    Thermal Break
    Thermal Bridge
    Woodstove
    Zero Energy Ready

    RSS Feed

Copyright © 2013     l     323 Gibbs Road, Steeles Tavern     l     (540) 416-3590     l     prometheanhomes@gmail.com



Remodeling and Home Design